No, it's a cache, not a storage solution. When you put things in memcache
you are not guaranteed to be able to retrieve them again.
/Henrik
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 07:23, Sreejith S <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi..
> Thnk u for ur reply...
> let me explain my scenario
> On a sample set od 1000 documents i am generating a matrix of (may be)
> 1000000 * 1000 .I have much larger document set than this say 50000.
> So can memcahe be able to store these huge matrix representation as u
> said??
>
> Sreejith
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 6:56 AM, PlumbersStock.com <
>
[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> When dealing with large data sets I sometimes split it into parts that
>> will fit with a master object that stores how many parts it should
>> have. Of course it could still fall out of cache but it's no worse
>> than if it was one large object that fell out of cache and possible
>> better if you kept a primary copy somewhere so you only have to grab
>> the missing chunks from it.
>>
>> big_object: 5
>> big_object_0: data
>> big_object_1: data
>> big_object_2: data
>> big_object_3: data
>> big_object_4: data
>
>
>