<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
    <channel>
        <title>[PHP-DEV] voting without vcs accounts</title>
        <description>Hi,

I sent an email last year about this issue, but it got sidetracked (partly
it was my fault):
http://www.mail-archive.com/internals@lists.php.net/msg54267.html
So this time, I would like focusing only on the following:

   1. What are the requirements for getting voting rights in the wiki
   without having a vcs/master account?
      - The voting RFC states:
         - Representatives from the PHP community, that will be chosen by
         those with php.net SVN accounts
            - Lead developers of PHP based projects (frameworks, cms,
            tools, etc.)
            - regular participant of internals discussions
         2. What are the necessary steps from a volunteer to request voting
   karma?
   3. How do we handle the applicants? Who will &quot;judge&quot; the applications?
   4. How can we see the list of the people having voting karma? Currently
   only the wiki admins can see who are the people with the voting group
   membership.


The wiki is already prepared to support voting without vcs account: there
is a voting group, anybody having membership in that group are able to vote
(
http://git.php.net/?p=web/wiki.git;a=commit;h=e3b97f03548fab661b5bc2dd66420db1024b1f39
).

My personal opinion would be that we have an application form like we have
for the vcs account request, which will send an email to the mailing list,
we can discuss here whether we support/approve the applicant or not, and
somebody with proper karma can approve/decline the application, which would
also trigger an email to the mailing list.

-- 
Ferenc Kovács
@Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu</description>
        <link>http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,479826,479826#msg-479826</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 23:18:19 +0200</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Phorum 5.2.18</generator>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,479826,662447#msg-662447</guid>
            <title>[PHP-DEV] Re: voting without vcs accounts</title>
            <link>http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,479826,662447#msg-662447</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Ferenc Kovacs &lt;tyra3l@gmail.com&gt; wrote:<br />
<br />
&gt; Hi,<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; I sent an email last year about this issue, but it got sidetracked (partly<br />
&gt; it was my fault):<br />
&gt; <a href="http://www.mail-archive.com/internals@lists.php.net/msg54267.html" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://www.mail-archive.com/internals@lists.php.net/msg54267.html</a><br />
&gt; So this time, I would like focusing only on the following:<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt;    1. What are the requirements for getting voting rights in the wiki<br />
&gt;    without having a vcs/master account?<br />
&gt;       - The voting RFC states:<br />
&gt;          - Representatives from the PHP community, that will be chosen by<br />
&gt;          those with php.net SVN accounts<br />
&gt;             - Lead developers of PHP based projects (frameworks, cms,<br />
&gt;             tools, etc.)<br />
&gt;             - regular participant of internals discussions<br />
&gt;          2. What are the necessary steps from a volunteer to request<br />
&gt;    voting karma?<br />
&gt;    3. How do we handle the applicants? Who will &quot;judge&quot; the applications?<br />
&gt;    4. How can we see the list of the people having voting karma?<br />
&gt;    Currently only the wiki admins can see who are the people with the voting<br />
&gt;    group membership.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; The wiki is already prepared to support voting without vcs account: there<br />
&gt; is a voting group, anybody having membership in that group are able to vote<br />
&gt; (<br />
&gt; <a href="http://git.php.net/?p=web/wiki.git;a=commit;h=e3b97f03548fab661b5bc2dd66420db1024b1f39" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://git.php.net/?p=web/wiki.git;a=commit;h=e3b97f03548fab661b5bc2dd66420db1024b1f39</a><br />
&gt; ).<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; My personal opinion would be that we have an application form like we have<br />
&gt; for the vcs account request, which will send an email to the mailing list,<br />
&gt; we can discuss here whether we support/approve the applicant or not, and<br />
&gt; somebody with proper karma can approve/decline the application, which would<br />
&gt; also trigger an email to the mailing list.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; --<br />
&gt; Ferenc Kovács<br />
&gt; @Tyr43l - <a href="http://tyrael.hu" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://tyrael.hu</a><br />
&gt;<br />
<br />
<br />
Hi,<br />
<br />
Seeing the discussion/confusion yesterday I'm bringing this up again, maybe<br />
we can get an agreement this time.<br />
<br />
-- <br />
Ferenc Kovács<br />
@Tyr43l - <a href="http://tyrael.hu" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://tyrael.hu</a>]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Ferenc Kovacs</dc:creator>
            <category>php-internals</category>
            <pubDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2013 09:20:02 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,479826,481707#msg-481707</guid>
            <title>Re: [PHP-DEV] voting without vcs accounts</title>
            <link>http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,479826,481707#msg-481707</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ &gt;<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; And I wonder why that should have more precise rules than the ones we<br />
&gt; use to hand out accounts. Basically every candidate I imagine could get<br />
&gt; a &quot;proper&quot; account easily, if they want.<br />
<br />
<br />
   - we have a dedicated page for requesting vcs account<br />
   - we also have an agreed upon, loosely defined set of requirements for<br />
   handing out accounts (first send patches and after a few gets accepted, you<br />
   should apply for your own account)<br />
   - it is a public information who can approve accounts (it is well<br />
   hidden, but public:<br />
   <a href="http://git.php.net/?p=web/master.git;a=blob;f=manage/users.php;h=75c5aa6bf9812b653de35c43667ef03387050437;hb=HEAD#l478" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://git.php.net/?p=web/master.git;a=blob;f=manage/users.php;h=75c5aa6bf9812b653de35c43667ef03387050437;hb=HEAD#l478</a><br />
    ^^)<br />
   - when an account is approved or rejected, a mail is sent to the list,<br />
   where we can see who approved/denied/deleted the account<br />
<br />
 if we can have the same for the non-vcs voting approval, that would be<br />
fine with me.<br />
<br />
-- <br />
Ferenc Kovács<br />
@Tyr43l - <a href="http://tyrael.hu" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://tyrael.hu</a>]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Ferenc Kovacs</dc:creator>
            <category>php-internals</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 15:50:03 +0200</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,479826,481664#msg-481664</guid>
            <title>Re: [PHP-DEV] voting without vcs accounts</title>
            <link>http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,479826,481664#msg-481664</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 10:23 +0200, Gustavo Lopes wrote:<br />
&gt; I think the issue is not who, in general terms, can vote, but how a  <br />
&gt; determination that someone is covered by those terms is made.<br />
&gt; <br />
&gt; What is a &quot;known&quot; OSS project? For instance, which of these would<br />
&gt; qualify:  <br />
&gt; <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_web_application_frameworks#PHP" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_web_application_frameworks#PHP</a> ?<br />
<br />
If the vote is bound to the other project: does this mean the other<br />
project has to decide about a &quot;delegate&quot;? Could the organisation revoke<br />
that delegation or replace him? Would we therefore only work with<br />
projects which are setup properly? (This would mean that a project<br />
organized like PHP won't get a vote)<br />
<br />
Right now accounts (and therefore voting rights) are handed out based on<br />
individual contributions. And I think that's a good model to follow for<br />
the votes.<br />
<br />
The way I understood the rule was to be able to give regular<br />
participants in discussions, (assuming they actually make useful<br />
contributions ;-) ) voting karma even though they don't contribute code.<br />
And I wonder why that should have more precise rules than the ones we<br />
use to hand out accounts. Basically every candidate I imagine could get<br />
a &quot;proper&quot; account easily, if they want.<br />
<br />
johannes<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
-- <br />
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List<br />
To unsubscribe, visit: <a href="http://www.php.net/unsub.php" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://www.php.net/unsub.php</a>]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Johannes Schlüter</dc:creator>
            <category>php-internals</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 15:20:04 +0200</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,479826,481520#msg-481520</guid>
            <title>Re: [PHP-DEV] voting without vcs accounts</title>
            <link>http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,479826,481520#msg-481520</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 07:34:06 +0200, Pierre Joye &lt;pierre.php@gmail.com&gt;  <br />
wrote:<br />
<br />
&gt; On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 12:50 AM, Stas Malyshev &lt;smalyshev@sugarcrm.com&gt;  <br />
&gt; wrote:<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; I have a problem that we don't have understanding of what is the goal of<br />
&gt;&gt; this whole vote setup. What is it for? What we will be doing with it?<br />
&gt;&gt; And please don't say &quot;it says so in RFC&quot; - it is not a goal.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Let me clarify that and try to do not go backwards while we have<br />
&gt; finally moved forward.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; The goal is to have community leader participating in our design<br />
&gt; discussions and decisions. It has happened already for a couple of<br />
&gt; RFCs (accepted and rejected) and went very well. The FUDs about core<br />
&gt; devs, legacy developers and the like loosing control about the<br />
&gt; direction PHP takes has been killed, it did not happen and it is very<br />
&gt; unlikely that it will happen.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; How do the community leaders come in? They are usually very well known<br />
&gt; and already participate to php in one way or another (bugs report,<br />
&gt; testing, etc.) and are part of a known OSS project (we have drupal,<br />
&gt; zf, symfony already for example). Having a couple of devs to second<br />
&gt; their addition is also requested.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; This has been said many times already in the past and it is said in<br />
&gt; the RFC as well. We do not need over killed process as an attempt to<br />
&gt; make php more closed to our communities.<br />
&gt;<br />
<br />
I think the issue is not who, in general terms, can vote, but how a  <br />
determination that someone is covered by those terms is made.<br />
<br />
What is a &quot;known&quot; OSS project? For instance, which of these would qualify:  <br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_web_application_frameworks#PHP" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_web_application_frameworks#PHP</a> ?<br />
<br />
Of course, it's impossible to set a clear line on what is a &quot;known&quot;  <br />
project. Which leads to arbitrariness. Which leads to the second question  <br />
-- who approves those voting rights? It's been said in this thread that  <br />
any wiki admin can approve an account without saying anything. Is this  <br />
case? Who was approved, by whom, and who &quot;seconded the addition&quot; of these  <br />
accounts? Personally, I don't know.<br />
<br />
These are, in my opinion, legitimate concerns that should not be dismissed  <br />
(and &quot;has been said in the past&quot; and allusions to obviousness or lack of  <br />
problems so far are not appropriate responses).<br />
<br />
-- <br />
Gustavo Lopes<br />
<br />
-- <br />
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List<br />
To unsubscribe, visit: <a href="http://www.php.net/unsub.php" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://www.php.net/unsub.php</a>]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Gustavo Lopes</dc:creator>
            <category>php-internals</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 10:30:02 +0200</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,479826,481507#msg-481507</guid>
            <title>Re: [PHP-DEV] voting without vcs accounts</title>
            <link>http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,479826,481507#msg-481507</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Pierre Joye wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt; I am ignoring the comment about FUDs because I have no idea what it is<br />
&gt;&gt; &gt;  about, so I guess you are answering somebody other's comment that I have<br />
&gt;&gt; &gt;  not read.<br />
&gt; It was not for you directly but the voting opponent (the very few we<br />
&gt; have) who cannot get over it. However you are right, they can be<br />
&gt; ignored (for their opinion about voting :).<br />
<br />
I guess that covers me :(<br />
<br />
-- <br />
Lester Caine - G8HFL<br />
-----------------------------<br />
Contact - <a href="http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact</a><br />
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - <a href="http://lsces.co.uk" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://lsces.co.uk</a><br />
EnquirySolve - <a href="http://enquirysolve.com/" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://enquirysolve.com/</a><br />
Model Engineers Digital Workshop - <a href="http://medw.co.uk//" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://medw.co.uk//</a><br />
Firebird - <a href="http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php</a><br />
<br />
-- <br />
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List<br />
To unsubscribe, visit: <a href="http://www.php.net/unsub.php" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://www.php.net/unsub.php</a>]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Lester Caine</dc:creator>
            <category>php-internals</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 10:10:02 +0200</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,479826,481476#msg-481476</guid>
            <title>Re: [PHP-DEV] voting without vcs accounts</title>
            <link>http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,479826,481476#msg-481476</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ hi Stas,<br />
<br />
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Stas Malyshev &lt;smalyshev@sugarcrm.com&gt; wrote:<br />
&gt; Hi!<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; The goal is to have community leader participating in our design<br />
&gt;&gt; discussions and decisions. It has happened already for a couple of<br />
&gt;&gt; RFCs (accepted and rejected) and went very well. The FUDs about core<br />
&gt;&gt; devs, legacy developers and the like loosing control about the<br />
&gt;&gt; direction PHP takes has been killed, it did not happen and it is very<br />
&gt;&gt; unlikely that it will happen.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Excellent. So we have people participating, contributing to RFCs,<br />
&gt; getting features accepted, etc. So what's the problem that needs fixing?<br />
<br />
Nothing right now, everything works as it should so far. We may do a<br />
review in a year, or half a year. But as of now we are on track and<br />
everything seems to run well.<br />
<br />
&gt; I am ignoring the comment about FUDs because I have no idea what it is<br />
&gt; about, so I guess you are answering somebody other's comment that I have<br />
&gt; not read.<br />
<br />
It was not for you directly but the voting opponent (the very few we<br />
have) who cannot get over it. However you are right, they can be<br />
ignored (for their opinion about voting :).<br />
<br />
Cheers,<br />
-- <br />
Pierre<br />
<br />
@pierrejoye | <a href="http://blog.thepimp.net" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://blog.thepimp.net</a> | <a href="http://www.libgd.org" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://www.libgd.org</a><br />
<br />
-- <br />
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List<br />
To unsubscribe, visit: <a href="http://www.php.net/unsub.php" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://www.php.net/unsub.php</a>]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Pierre Joye</dc:creator>
            <category>php-internals</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 09:10:03 +0200</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,479826,481475#msg-481475</guid>
            <title>Re: [PHP-DEV] voting without vcs accounts</title>
            <link>http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,479826,481475#msg-481475</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Hi!<br />
<br />
&gt; The goal is to have community leader participating in our design<br />
&gt; discussions and decisions. It has happened already for a couple of<br />
&gt; RFCs (accepted and rejected) and went very well. The FUDs about core<br />
&gt; devs, legacy developers and the like loosing control about the<br />
&gt; direction PHP takes has been killed, it did not happen and it is very<br />
&gt; unlikely that it will happen.<br />
<br />
Excellent. So we have people participating, contributing to RFCs,<br />
getting features accepted, etc. So what's the problem that needs fixing?<br />
I am ignoring the comment about FUDs because I have no idea what it is<br />
about, so I guess you are answering somebody other's comment that I have<br />
not read.<br />
<br />
&gt; the RFC as well. We do not need over killed process as an attempt to<br />
&gt; make php more closed to our communities.<br />
<br />
I'm sorry I didn't understand the last sentence. Could you please<br />
explain what you meant by that?<br />
-- <br />
Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect<br />
SugarCRM: <a href="http://www.sugarcrm.com/" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://www.sugarcrm.com/</a><br />
(408)454-6900 ext. 227<br />
<br />
-- <br />
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List<br />
To unsubscribe, visit: <a href="http://www.php.net/unsub.php" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://www.php.net/unsub.php</a>]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Stas Malyshev</dc:creator>
            <category>php-internals</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 09:10:03 +0200</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,479826,481426#msg-481426</guid>
            <title>Re: [PHP-DEV] voting without vcs accounts</title>
            <link>http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,479826,481426#msg-481426</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 7:37 AM, Pierre Joye &lt;pierre.php@gmail.com&gt; wrote:<br />
&gt; hi,<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Philip Olson &lt;philip@roshambo.org&gt; wrote:<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;  1. Those with SVN [sic] access (but how does karma come into play?)<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; It does, or we begin to have 2nd, 3rd and totally irrelevant classes<br />
&gt; of developers or doc writers.<br />
<br />
A &quot;not&quot; was missing. It should have been:<br />
<br />
It does not, or we begin to have 2nd, 3rd and totally irrelevant<br />
classes of developers or doc writers.<br />
<br />
Cheers,<br />
-- <br />
Pierre<br />
<br />
@pierrejoye | <a href="http://blog.thepimp.net" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://blog.thepimp.net</a> | <a href="http://www.libgd.org" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://www.libgd.org</a><br />
<br />
-- <br />
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List<br />
To unsubscribe, visit: <a href="http://www.php.net/unsub.php" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://www.php.net/unsub.php</a>]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Pierre Joye</dc:creator>
            <category>php-internals</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 07:40:03 +0200</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,479826,481425#msg-481425</guid>
            <title>Re: [PHP-DEV] voting without vcs accounts</title>
            <link>http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,479826,481425#msg-481425</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ hi,<br />
<br />
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Philip Olson &lt;philip@roshambo.org&gt; wrote:<br />
<br />
&gt;  1. Those with SVN [sic] access (but how does karma come into play?)<br />
<br />
It does, or we begin to have 2nd, 3rd and totally irrelevant classes<br />
of developers or doc writers.<br />
<br />
&gt;  2. Those without (how do we provide such rights? to whom?)<br />
<br />
See my other reply, easy, simple, harmless.<br />
<br />
&gt; I suspect most people voted &quot;Yes&quot; for that RFC thinking it'd mean less noise<br />
&gt; on this list while not caring about the details. That's only a guess. But<br />
&gt; trouble is, defining the &quot;Who&quot; is the most difficult part and a big reason why<br />
&gt; general consensus is preferred.<br />
<br />
I prefer not to comment on that part. It is like saying that people<br />
are not able to take a qualified decision, for whatever reasons. I<br />
have been myself tempted to think or say the same about some of the<br />
php.net members, and have been proven wrong many times. So let ignore<br />
this comment.<br />
<br />
<br />
Cheers,<br />
-- <br />
Pierre<br />
<br />
@pierrejoye | <a href="http://blog.thepimp.net" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://blog.thepimp.net</a> | <a href="http://www.libgd.org" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://www.libgd.org</a><br />
<br />
-- <br />
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List<br />
To unsubscribe, visit: <a href="http://www.php.net/unsub.php" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://www.php.net/unsub.php</a>]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Pierre Joye</dc:creator>
            <category>php-internals</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 07:40:03 +0200</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,479826,481424#msg-481424</guid>
            <title>Re: [PHP-DEV] voting without vcs accounts</title>
            <link>http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,479826,481424#msg-481424</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ hi Stas,<br />
<br />
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 12:50 AM, Stas Malyshev &lt;smalyshev@sugarcrm.com&gt; wrote:<br />
<br />
&gt; I have a problem that we don't have understanding of what is the goal of<br />
&gt; this whole vote setup. What is it for? What we will be doing with it?<br />
&gt; And please don't say &quot;it says so in RFC&quot; - it is not a goal.<br />
<br />
Let me clarify that and try to do not go backwards while we have<br />
finally moved forward.<br />
<br />
The goal is to have community leader participating in our design<br />
discussions and decisions. It has happened already for a couple of<br />
RFCs (accepted and rejected) and went very well. The FUDs about core<br />
devs, legacy developers and the like loosing control about the<br />
direction PHP takes has been killed, it did not happen and it is very<br />
unlikely that it will happen.<br />
<br />
How do the community leaders come in? They are usually very well known<br />
and already participate to php in one way or another (bugs report,<br />
testing, etc.) and are part of a known OSS project (we have drupal,<br />
zf, symfony already for example). Having a couple of devs to second<br />
their addition is also requested.<br />
<br />
This has been said many times already in the past and it is said in<br />
the RFC as well. We do not need over killed process as an attempt to<br />
make php more closed to our communities.<br />
<br />
Cheers,<br />
-- <br />
Pierre<br />
<br />
@pierrejoye | <a href="http://blog.thepimp.net" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://blog.thepimp.net</a> | <a href="http://www.libgd.org" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://www.libgd.org</a><br />
<br />
-- <br />
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List<br />
To unsubscribe, visit: <a href="http://www.php.net/unsub.php" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://www.php.net/unsub.php</a>]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Pierre Joye</dc:creator>
            <category>php-internals</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 07:40:02 +0200</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,479826,481264#msg-481264</guid>
            <title>Re: [PHP-DEV] voting without vcs accounts</title>
            <link>http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,479826,481264#msg-481264</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ On Apr 17, 2012, at 4:08 PM, Christopher Jones wrote:<br />
<br />
&gt; <br />
&gt; <br />
&gt; On 04/17/2012 03:50 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt; Hi!<br />
&gt;&gt; <br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; sorry, I can't really follow you with that.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; do you have a problem allowing the non-vcs users (defined by the voting<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; rfc) to vote, or do you have a problem providing a clear way for them to<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; get their voting karma?<br />
&gt;&gt; <br />
&gt;&gt; I have a problem that we don't have understanding of what is the goal of<br />
&gt;&gt; this whole vote setup. What is it for? What we will be doing with it?<br />
&gt;&gt; And please don't say &quot;it says so in RFC&quot; - it is not a goal.<br />
&gt; <br />
&gt; Stas, I'm with Ferenc on this.  We just need one or two sentences somewhere<br />
&gt; in the wiki saying how non-contributors can get vote karma.  The sentences<br />
&gt; should give the physical process and what kind of people we will give karma to.<br />
<br />
The problem is that the voting RFC does not define who can vote. It contains<br />
two parts:<br />
<br />
  1. Those with SVN [sic] access (but how does karma come into play?)<br />
  2. Those without (how do we provide such rights? to whom?)<br />
<br />
If these are to be answered (they should) then I don't think an RFC can be <br />
edited like that (people already voted on it), so suspect we'd need a new <br />
RFC to replace it. Fun!<br />
<br />
I suspect most people voted &quot;Yes&quot; for that RFC thinking it'd mean less noise<br />
on this list while not caring about the details. That's only a guess. But <br />
trouble is, defining the &quot;Who&quot; is the most difficult part and a big reason why<br />
general consensus is preferred. <br />
<br />
Regards,<br />
Philip<br />
<br />
<br />
-- <br />
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List<br />
To unsubscribe, visit: <a href="http://www.php.net/unsub.php" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://www.php.net/unsub.php</a>]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Philip Olson</dc:creator>
            <category>php-internals</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 01:40:02 +0200</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,479826,481251#msg-481251</guid>
            <title>Re: [PHP-DEV] voting without vcs accounts</title>
            <link>http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,479826,481251#msg-481251</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ On 04/17/2012 03:50 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote:<br />
&gt; Hi!<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; sorry, I can't really follow you with that.<br />
&gt;&gt; do you have a problem allowing the non-vcs users (defined by the voting<br />
&gt;&gt; rfc) to vote, or do you have a problem providing a clear way for them to<br />
&gt;&gt; get their voting karma?<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; I have a problem that we don't have understanding of what is the goal of<br />
&gt; this whole vote setup. What is it for? What we will be doing with it?<br />
&gt; And please don't say &quot;it says so in RFC&quot; - it is not a goal.<br />
<br />
Stas, I'm with Ferenc on this.  We just need one or two sentences somewhere<br />
in the wiki saying how non-contributors can get vote karma.  The sentences<br />
should give the physical process and what kind of people we will give karma to.<br />
<br />
Chris<br />
<br />
-- <br />
<a href="mailto:&#99;&#104;&#114;&#105;&#115;&#116;&#111;&#112;&#104;&#101;&#114;&#46;&#106;&#111;&#110;&#101;&#115;&#64;&#111;&#114;&#97;&#99;&#108;&#101;&#46;&#99;&#111;&#109;">&#99;&#104;&#114;&#105;&#115;&#116;&#111;&#112;&#104;&#101;&#114;&#46;&#106;&#111;&#110;&#101;&#115;&#64;&#111;&#114;&#97;&#99;&#108;&#101;&#46;&#99;&#111;&#109;</a><br />
<a href="http://twitter.com/#!/ghrd" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/#!/ghrd</a><br />
<br />
-- <br />
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List<br />
To unsubscribe, visit: <a href="http://www.php.net/unsub.php" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://www.php.net/unsub.php</a>]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Christopher Jones</dc:creator>
            <category>php-internals</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 01:10:02 +0200</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,479826,481242#msg-481242</guid>
            <title>Re: [PHP-DEV] voting without vcs accounts</title>
            <link>http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,479826,481242#msg-481242</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Hi!<br />
<br />
&gt; sorry, I can't really follow you with that.<br />
&gt; do you have a problem allowing the non-vcs users (defined by the voting<br />
&gt; rfc) to vote, or do you have a problem providing a clear way for them to<br />
&gt; get their voting karma?<br />
<br />
I have a problem that we don't have understanding of what is the goal of<br />
this whole vote setup. What is it for? What we will be doing with it?<br />
And please don't say &quot;it says so in RFC&quot; - it is not a goal.<br />
-- <br />
Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect<br />
SugarCRM: <a href="http://www.sugarcrm.com/" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://www.sugarcrm.com/</a><br />
(408)454-6900 ext. 227<br />
<br />
-- <br />
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List<br />
To unsubscribe, visit: <a href="http://www.php.net/unsub.php" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://www.php.net/unsub.php</a>]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Stas Malyshev</dc:creator>
            <category>php-internals</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 01:00:15 +0200</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,479826,481211#msg-481211</guid>
            <title>Re: [PHP-DEV] voting without vcs accounts</title>
            <link>http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,479826,481211#msg-481211</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 11:48 PM, Stas Malyshev &lt;smalyshev@sugarcrm.com&gt;wrote:<br />
<br />
&gt; Hi!<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; &gt; <a href="http://www.mail-archive.com/internals@lists.php.net/msg51948.html" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://www.mail-archive.com/internals@lists.php.net/msg51948.html</a><br />
&gt; &gt; Pierre said that it was a bug(better to say lack of restriction), that<br />
&gt; &gt; everybody with wiki account was able to vote, so I changed the voting<br />
&gt; &gt; plugin to only allow the specific groups(vcs + voting) to be able to<br />
&gt; vote.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; This is the authenticated vote. It has also option of having<br />
&gt; non-authenticated vote.<br />
&gt;<br />
<br />
ok, I didn't knew/remembered that.<br />
<br />
&gt; To be able to get voting karma if you meet the requirements. without the<br />
&gt; &gt; need to bribe Hannes, Philip or any other wiki admin.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; I don't see how getting you &quot;voting carma&quot;, whatever it might be, can be<br />
&gt; a goal of PHP project. I'm talking about the goal of the whole thing.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt;<br />
sorry, I can't really follow you with that.<br />
do you have a problem allowing the non-vcs users (defined by the voting<br />
rfc) to vote, or do you have a problem providing a clear way for them to<br />
get their voting karma?<br />
<br />
-- <br />
Ferenc Kovács<br />
@Tyr43l - <a href="http://tyrael.hu" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://tyrael.hu</a>]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Ferenc Kovacs</dc:creator>
            <category>php-internals</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 00:00:01 +0200</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,479826,481210#msg-481210</guid>
            <title>Re: [PHP-DEV] voting without vcs accounts</title>
            <link>http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,479826,481210#msg-481210</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Hi!<br />
<br />
&gt; <a href="http://www.mail-archive.com/internals@lists.php.net/msg51948.html" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://www.mail-archive.com/internals@lists.php.net/msg51948.html</a><br />
&gt; Pierre said that it was a bug(better to say lack of restriction), that<br />
&gt; everybody with wiki account was able to vote, so I changed the voting<br />
&gt; plugin to only allow the specific groups(vcs + voting) to be able to vote.<br />
<br />
This is the authenticated vote. It has also option of having<br />
non-authenticated vote.<br />
<br />
&gt;     My point is that we are talking about some formal processes but I don't<br />
&gt;     see what would be the desired purpose of such processes. For release<br />
&gt;     process, it's releasing a stable code in time. For RFC, it is informing<br />
&gt;     people about proposed feature and getting it discussed and hopefully<br />
&gt;     accepted. Here, I'm not sure what is the goal.<br />
&gt; <br />
&gt; <br />
&gt; To be able to get voting karma if you meet the requirements. without the<br />
&gt; need to bribe Hannes, Philip or any other wiki admin.<br />
<br />
I don't see how getting you &quot;voting carma&quot;, whatever it might be, can be<br />
a goal of PHP project. I'm talking about the goal of the whole thing.<br />
-- <br />
Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect<br />
SugarCRM: <a href="http://www.sugarcrm.com/" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://www.sugarcrm.com/</a><br />
(408)454-6900 ext. 227<br />
<br />
-- <br />
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List<br />
To unsubscribe, visit: <a href="http://www.php.net/unsub.php" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://www.php.net/unsub.php</a>]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Stas Malyshev</dc:creator>
            <category>php-internals</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 23:50:02 +0200</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,479826,480671#msg-480671</guid>
            <title>Re: [PHP-DEV] voting without vcs accounts</title>
            <link>http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,479826,480671#msg-480671</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ &gt;<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; Why would that be a separate thread?  Isn't that what we're talking<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; about?  I.e. determining who gets voting access and who doesn't?<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;  I just ask for clarification on how the community representatives (which<br />
&gt;&gt; is defined in the accepted voting RFC) can get their karma.<br />
&gt;&gt; You are talking about changing the requirements for somebody to be able<br />
&gt;&gt; to participate in the voting, thus changing/extending the original RFC.<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; It's the same topic, and the question of who *should* or should not be<br />
&gt; allowed to vote was already raised previously on this thread.  That's what<br />
&gt; I was responding to.  So, deep breath....  =)<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt;<br />
I think Stas was a little bit offtopic/red herring with the discussion on<br />
why do we need non-vcs people to be allowed to vote.<br />
But to use that as an excuse to hijack the thread to resurrect the &quot;why<br />
can't everybody vote&quot; discussion isn't really nice, and I even asked it<br />
especially to not to do, as that was the reason which halted my previous<br />
attempt to address this issue.<br />
Could we all please focus on the original topic?<br />
Thanks!<br />
<br />
-- <br />
Ferenc Kovács<br />
@Tyr43l - <a href="http://tyrael.hu" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://tyrael.hu</a>]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Ferenc Kovacs</dc:creator>
            <category>php-internals</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 09:40:02 +0200</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,479826,480603#msg-480603</guid>
            <title>Re: [PHP-DEV] voting without vcs accounts</title>
            <link>http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,479826,480603#msg-480603</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ On Apr 16, 2012, at 6:21 PM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:<br />
<br />
&gt; On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 3:14 AM, Kris Craig &lt;kris.craig@gmail.com&gt; wrote:<br />
&gt; <br />
&gt;&gt; <br />
&gt;&gt; <br />
&gt;&gt; On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Ferenc Kovacs &lt;tyra3l@gmail.com&gt; wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt; <br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; <br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Just to play devil's advocate (Satan and I go way back), what about<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; people who are established PHP developers but who generally don't<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; participate in the development/discussion of PHP core?  An argument could<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; be made that, as the users of PHP, they should be able to have some say in<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; its development.  That's not my position, mind you; I'm just throwing that<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; premise out there to see if it holds up.  =)<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; <br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; <br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; could you please open a separate thread for that?<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; btw. &quot;regular participant of internals discussions&quot; is one of the reason<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; on which group someone can get voting karma.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; so if that is provided, anybody have a chance to get join<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; the decision making process.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; <br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; --<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; Ferenc Kovács<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; @Tyr43l - <a href="http://tyrael.hu" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://tyrael.hu</a><br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; <br />
&gt;&gt; <br />
&gt;&gt; Why would that be a separate thread?  Isn't that what we're talking<br />
&gt;&gt; about?  I.e. determining who gets voting access and who doesn't?<br />
&gt; <br />
&gt; <br />
&gt; I just ask for clarification on how the community representatives (which is<br />
&gt; defined in the accepted voting RFC) can get their karma.<br />
&gt; You are talking about changing the requirements for somebody to be able to<br />
&gt; participate in the voting, thus changing/extending the original RFC.<br />
<br />
The voting RFC is unclear but aside from that, there are two non-vcs <br />
accounts with voting karma today:<br />
<br />
  User: damz:  Damien Tournoud - <a href="mailto:&#100;&#97;&#109;&#122;&#64;&#100;&#97;&#109;&#122;&#46;&#111;&#114;&#103;">&#100;&#97;&#109;&#122;&#64;&#100;&#97;&#109;&#122;&#46;&#111;&#114;&#103;</a><br />
  User: hywan: Ivan Enderlin   - <a href="mailto:&#105;&#118;&#97;&#110;&#46;&#101;&#110;&#100;&#101;&#114;&#108;&#105;&#110;&#64;&#104;&#111;&#97;&#45;&#112;&#114;&#111;&#106;&#101;&#99;&#116;&#46;&#110;&#101;&#116;">&#105;&#118;&#97;&#110;&#46;&#101;&#110;&#100;&#101;&#114;&#108;&#105;&#110;&#64;&#104;&#111;&#97;&#45;&#112;&#114;&#111;&#106;&#101;&#99;&#116;&#46;&#110;&#101;&#116;</a><br />
<br />
Not saying they should or should not, but just saying. And I'm not sure <br />
how/when they received the voting karma but it happened.<br />
<br />
Regards,<br />
Philip<br />
-- <br />
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List<br />
To unsubscribe, visit: <a href="http://www.php.net/unsub.php" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://www.php.net/unsub.php</a>]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Philip Olson</dc:creator>
            <category>php-internals</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 06:30:02 +0200</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,479826,480574#msg-480574</guid>
            <title>Re: [PHP-DEV] voting without vcs accounts</title>
            <link>http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,479826,480574#msg-480574</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Ryan McCue &lt;lists@rotorised.com&gt; wrote:<br />
<br />
&gt; Kris Craig wrote:<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; An argument could be made that, as the users of PHP, they should be able<br />
&gt;&gt; to have some say in its development.<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; As a PHP developer (that is, a developer who writes in PHP), I'd agree,<br />
&gt; *to an extent*. There are certainly things that I'd like to be able to vote<br />
&gt; on (such as additions to the language/syntax and things such as .phpp).<br />
&gt; However, I've got no idea how easy such things are to implement, so I don't<br />
&gt; feel qualified to even ask to be able to vote.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; However, these things are going to influence me as a developer, so I'd<br />
&gt; like to be able to vote.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Take, as an example, the .phpp debates. (Just as an example.) If I didn't<br />
&gt; like it, I'd like to be able to vote against it to avoid having to handle<br />
&gt; it later. However, if I *was* for it, I wouldn't feel qualified to comment,<br />
&gt; as I have no idea how hard these things are to implement.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; (Just my $0.02. Apologies if this is confusing, I'm a mixture of tired and<br />
&gt; distracted.)<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; --<br />
&gt; PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List<br />
&gt; To unsubscribe, visit: <a href="http://www.php.net/unsub.php" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://www.php.net/unsub.php</a><br />
&gt;<br />
&gt;<br />
Hmm yeah that makes sense.  What if we split the questions into multiple<br />
parts?  For example, the first question would be something along the lines<br />
of, &quot;Conceptually, do you think this is a good idea?&quot;  That could be open<br />
to PHP developers as well.  Then the second question could be, &quot;If you<br />
answered 'Yes', as a core contributor, do you believe this proposal is<br />
technically feasible?&quot;  That question would be open only to the people who<br />
can vote now.<br />
<br />
Mind you, I'm just throwing this out there off the top of my head.  It<br />
could be a really stupid idea, but I thought it might provoke some<br />
interesting discussion at the very least.  With that in mind....  Thoughts?<br />
 =)<br />
<br />
--Kris]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Kris Craig</dc:creator>
            <category>php-internals</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 05:10:02 +0200</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,479826,480572#msg-480572</guid>
            <title>Re: [PHP-DEV] voting without vcs accounts</title>
            <link>http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,479826,480572#msg-480572</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Kris Craig wrote:<br />
&gt; An argument could be made that, as the users of PHP, they should be <br />
&gt; able to have some say in its development.<br />
<br />
As a PHP developer (that is, a developer who writes in PHP), I'd agree, <br />
*to an extent*. There are certainly things that I'd like to be able to <br />
vote on (such as additions to the language/syntax and things such as <br />
..phpp). However, I've got no idea how easy such things are to implement, <br />
so I don't feel qualified to even ask to be able to vote.<br />
<br />
However, these things are going to influence me as a developer, so I'd <br />
like to be able to vote.<br />
<br />
Take, as an example, the .phpp debates. (Just as an example.) If I <br />
didn't like it, I'd like to be able to vote against it to avoid having <br />
to handle it later. However, if I *was* for it, I wouldn't feel <br />
qualified to comment, as I have no idea how hard these things are to <br />
implement.<br />
<br />
(Just my $0.02. Apologies if this is confusing, I'm a mixture of tired <br />
and distracted.)<br />
<br />
-- <br />
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List<br />
To unsubscribe, visit: <a href="http://www.php.net/unsub.php" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://www.php.net/unsub.php</a>]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Ryan McCue</dc:creator>
            <category>php-internals</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 04:50:02 +0200</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,479826,480550#msg-480550</guid>
            <title>Re: [PHP-DEV] voting without vcs accounts</title>
            <link>http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,479826,480550#msg-480550</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 6:21 PM, Ferenc Kovacs &lt;tyra3l@gmail.com&gt; wrote:<br />
<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 3:14 AM, Kris Craig &lt;kris.craig@gmail.com&gt; wrote:<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Ferenc Kovacs &lt;tyra3l@gmail.com&gt; wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Just to play devil's advocate (Satan and I go way back), what about<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; people who are established PHP developers but who generally don't<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; participate in the development/discussion of PHP core?  An argument could<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; be made that, as the users of PHP, they should be able to have some say in<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; its development.  That's not my position, mind you; I'm just throwing that<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; premise out there to see if it holds up.  =)<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; could you please open a separate thread for that?<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; btw. &quot;regular participant of internals discussions&quot; is one of the reason<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; on which group someone can get voting karma.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; so if that is provided, anybody have a chance to get join<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; the decision making process.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; --<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; Ferenc Kovács<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; @Tyr43l - <a href="http://tyrael.hu" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://tyrael.hu</a><br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; Why would that be a separate thread?  Isn't that what we're talking<br />
&gt;&gt; about?  I.e. determining who gets voting access and who doesn't?<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; I just ask for clarification on how the community representatives (which<br />
&gt; is defined in the accepted voting RFC) can get their karma.<br />
&gt; You are talking about changing the requirements for somebody to be able to<br />
&gt; participate in the voting, thus changing/extending the original RFC.<br />
&gt;<br />
<br />
It's the same topic, and the question of who *should* or should not be<br />
allowed to vote was already raised previously on this thread.  That's what<br />
I was responding to.  So, deep breath....  =)<br />
<br />
--Kris<br />
<br />
<br />
&gt; --<br />
&gt; Ferenc Kovács<br />
&gt; @Tyr43l - <a href="http://tyrael.hu" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://tyrael.hu</a><br />
&gt;]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Kris Craig</dc:creator>
            <category>php-internals</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 03:40:02 +0200</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,479826,480546#msg-480546</guid>
            <title>Re: [PHP-DEV] voting without vcs accounts</title>
            <link>http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,479826,480546#msg-480546</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 3:14 AM, Kris Craig &lt;kris.craig@gmail.com&gt; wrote:<br />
<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Ferenc Kovacs &lt;tyra3l@gmail.com&gt; wrote:<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; Just to play devil's advocate (Satan and I go way back), what about<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; people who are established PHP developers but who generally don't<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; participate in the development/discussion of PHP core?  An argument could<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; be made that, as the users of PHP, they should be able to have some say in<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; its development.  That's not my position, mind you; I'm just throwing that<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; premise out there to see if it holds up.  =)<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; could you please open a separate thread for that?<br />
&gt;&gt; btw. &quot;regular participant of internals discussions&quot; is one of the reason<br />
&gt;&gt; on which group someone can get voting karma.<br />
&gt;&gt; so if that is provided, anybody have a chance to get join<br />
&gt;&gt; the decision making process.<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; --<br />
&gt;&gt; Ferenc Kovács<br />
&gt;&gt; @Tyr43l - <a href="http://tyrael.hu" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://tyrael.hu</a><br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Why would that be a separate thread?  Isn't that what we're talking<br />
&gt; about?  I.e. determining who gets voting access and who doesn't?<br />
<br />
<br />
I just ask for clarification on how the community representatives (which is<br />
defined in the accepted voting RFC) can get their karma.<br />
You are talking about changing the requirements for somebody to be able to<br />
participate in the voting, thus changing/extending the original RFC.<br />
-- <br />
Ferenc Kovács<br />
@Tyr43l - <a href="http://tyrael.hu" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://tyrael.hu</a>]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Ferenc Kovacs</dc:creator>
            <category>php-internals</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 03:30:02 +0200</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,479826,480543#msg-480543</guid>
            <title>Re: [PHP-DEV] voting without vcs accounts</title>
            <link>http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,479826,480543#msg-480543</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Ferenc Kovacs &lt;tyra3l@gmail.com&gt; wrote:<br />
<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; Just to play devil's advocate (Satan and I go way back), what about<br />
&gt;&gt; people who are established PHP developers but who generally don't<br />
&gt;&gt; participate in the development/discussion of PHP core?  An argument could<br />
&gt;&gt; be made that, as the users of PHP, they should be able to have some say in<br />
&gt;&gt; its development.  That's not my position, mind you; I'm just throwing that<br />
&gt;&gt; premise out there to see if it holds up.  =)<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; could you please open a separate thread for that?<br />
&gt; btw. &quot;regular participant of internals discussions&quot; is one of the reason<br />
&gt; on which group someone can get voting karma.<br />
&gt; so if that is provided, anybody have a chance to get join<br />
&gt; the decision making process.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; --<br />
&gt; Ferenc Kovács<br />
&gt; @Tyr43l - <a href="http://tyrael.hu" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://tyrael.hu</a><br />
&gt;<br />
<br />
Why would that be a separate thread?  Isn't that what we're talking about?<br />
I.e. determining who gets voting access and who doesn't?<br />
<br />
--Kris]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Kris Craig</dc:creator>
            <category>php-internals</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 03:20:02 +0200</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,479826,480542#msg-480542</guid>
            <title>Re: [PHP-DEV] voting without vcs accounts</title>
            <link>http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,479826,480542#msg-480542</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ &gt;<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Just to play devil's advocate (Satan and I go way back), what about people<br />
&gt; who are established PHP developers but who generally don't participate in<br />
&gt; the development/discussion of PHP core?  An argument could be made that, as<br />
&gt; the users of PHP, they should be able to have some say in its development..<br />
&gt; That's not my position, mind you; I'm just throwing that premise out there<br />
&gt; to see if it holds up.  =)<br />
&gt;<br />
<br />
could you please open a separate thread for that?<br />
btw. &quot;regular participant of internals discussions&quot; is one of the reason on<br />
which group someone can get voting karma.<br />
so if that is provided, anybody have a chance to get join<br />
the decision making process.<br />
<br />
-- <br />
Ferenc Kovács<br />
@Tyr43l - <a href="http://tyrael.hu" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://tyrael.hu</a>]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Ferenc Kovacs</dc:creator>
            <category>php-internals</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 03:20:02 +0200</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,479826,480541#msg-480541</guid>
            <title>Re: [PHP-DEV] voting without vcs accounts</title>
            <link>http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,479826,480541#msg-480541</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Stas Malyshev &lt;smalyshev@sugarcrm.com&gt;wrote:<br />
<br />
&gt; Hi!<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; &gt; no, it only means that our internal processes aren't clear or easily<br />
&gt; &gt; accessible.<br />
&gt; &gt; people outside the circle can't do much, than asking people inside to<br />
&gt; &gt; let them in.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; If somebody is an outsider to PHP development, why do you think giving<br />
&gt; him a deciding vote on it would be a good thing? One can discuss things,<br />
&gt; propose changes, etc. without any special access.<br />
&gt;<br />
<br />
Just to play devil's advocate (Satan and I go way back), what about people<br />
who are established PHP developers but who generally don't participate in<br />
the development/discussion of PHP core?  An argument could be made that, as<br />
the users of PHP, they should be able to have some say in its development.<br />
That's not my position, mind you; I'm just throwing that premise out there<br />
to see if it holds up.  =)<br />
<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; &gt; you mean the +1/-1 on the mailing list threads?<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; No, I mean community voting in the wiki. Voting plugin has option to<br />
&gt; allow anybody to vote. We did such polls in the past. We can do it any day.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; &gt; but if we decide to keep it, we should make it possible for people to be<br />
&gt; &gt; able to request for voting karma, and a way to handle those requests.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Why sending a message to the list is not enough?<br />
&gt; --<br />
&gt; Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect<br />
&gt; SugarCRM: <a href="http://www.sugarcrm.com/" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://www.sugarcrm.com/</a><br />
&gt; (408)454-6900 ext. 227<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; --<br />
&gt; PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List<br />
&gt; To unsubscribe, visit: <a href="http://www.php.net/unsub.php" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://www.php.net/unsub.php</a><br />
&gt;<br />
&gt;]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Kris Craig</dc:creator>
            <category>php-internals</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 03:10:02 +0200</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,479826,480540#msg-480540</guid>
            <title>Re: [PHP-DEV] voting without vcs accounts</title>
            <link>http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,479826,480540#msg-480540</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 2:28 AM, Stas Malyshev &lt;smalyshev@sugarcrm.com&gt;wrote:<br />
<br />
&gt; Hi!<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; &gt; I'm not sure about it. AFAIK when I implemented my patch to restrict the<br />
&gt; &gt; voting to the vcs users + the voting wiki group, we lost that ability.<br />
&gt; &gt; (see <a href="http://www.mail-archive.com/internals@lists.php.net/msg51932.htmlfor" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://www.mail-archive.com/internals@lists.php.net/msg51932.htmlfor</a><br />
&gt; &gt; the history of that change)<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; I don't see any indication there that community vote is not possible,<br />
&gt; but if it was changed we can make community vote be available again.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt;<br />
<a href="http://www.mail-archive.com/internals@lists.php.net/msg51948.html" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://www.mail-archive.com/internals@lists.php.net/msg51948.html</a><br />
Pierre said that it was a bug(better to say lack of restriction), that<br />
everybody with wiki account was able to vote, so I changed the voting<br />
plugin to only allow the specific groups(vcs + voting) to be able to vote.<br />
nobody asked that we would still need to keep the ability to create &quot;open&quot;<br />
votes where anybody can vote, so it wasn't implemented.<br />
<br />
<br />
&gt; My point is that we are talking about some formal processes but I don't<br />
&gt; see what would be the desired purpose of such processes. For release<br />
&gt; process, it's releasing a stable code in time. For RFC, it is informing<br />
&gt; people about proposed feature and getting it discussed and hopefully<br />
&gt; accepted. Here, I'm not sure what is the goal.<br />
&gt;<br />
<br />
To be able to get voting karma if you meet the requirements. without the<br />
need to bribe Hannes, Philip or any other wiki admin.<br />
<br />
-- <br />
Ferenc Kovács<br />
@Tyr43l - <a href="http://tyrael.hu" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://tyrael.hu</a>]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Ferenc Kovacs</dc:creator>
            <category>php-internals</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 03:10:02 +0200</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,479826,480524#msg-480524</guid>
            <title>Re: [PHP-DEV] voting without vcs accounts</title>
            <link>http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,479826,480524#msg-480524</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Hi!<br />
<br />
&gt; I'm not sure about it. AFAIK when I implemented my patch to restrict the<br />
&gt; voting to the vcs users + the voting wiki group, we lost that ability.<br />
&gt; (see <a href="http://www.mail-archive.com/internals@lists.php.net/msg51932.html" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://www.mail-archive.com/internals@lists.php.net/msg51932.html</a> for<br />
&gt; the history of that change)<br />
<br />
I don't see any indication there that community vote is not possible,<br />
but if it was changed we can make community vote be available again.<br />
<br />
My point is that we are talking about some formal processes but I don't<br />
see what would be the desired purpose of such processes. For release<br />
process, it's releasing a stable code in time. For RFC, it is informing<br />
people about proposed feature and getting it discussed and hopefully<br />
accepted. Here, I'm not sure what is the goal.<br />
-- <br />
Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect<br />
SugarCRM: <a href="http://www.sugarcrm.com/" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://www.sugarcrm.com/</a><br />
(408)454-6900 ext. 227<br />
<br />
-- <br />
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List<br />
To unsubscribe, visit: <a href="http://www.php.net/unsub.php" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://www.php.net/unsub.php</a>]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Stas Malyshev</dc:creator>
            <category>php-internals</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 02:30:02 +0200</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,479826,480522#msg-480522</guid>
            <title>Re: [PHP-DEV] voting without vcs accounts</title>
            <link>http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,479826,480522#msg-480522</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 1:58 AM, Stas Malyshev &lt;smalyshev@sugarcrm.com&gt;wrote:<br />
<br />
&gt; Hi!<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; &gt; no, it only means that our internal processes aren't clear or easily<br />
&gt; &gt; accessible.<br />
&gt; &gt; people outside the circle can't do much, than asking people inside to<br />
&gt; &gt; let them in.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; If somebody is an outsider to PHP development, why do you think giving<br />
&gt; him a deciding vote on it would be a good thing? One can discuss things,<br />
&gt; propose changes, etc. without any special access.<br />
&gt;<br />
<br />
thats something which the current voting RFC allows. it seems that we are<br />
already over on that decision, as the accepted RFC had that clause.<br />
<br />
<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; &gt; you mean the +1/-1 on the mailing list threads?<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; No, I mean community voting in the wiki. Voting plugin has option to<br />
&gt; allow anybody to vote. We did such polls in the past. We can do it any day.<br />
&gt;<br />
<br />
I'm not sure about it. AFAIK when I implemented my patch to restrict the<br />
voting to the vcs users + the voting wiki group, we lost that ability. (see<br />
<a href="http://www.mail-archive.com/internals@lists.php.net/msg51932.html" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://www.mail-archive.com/internals@lists.php.net/msg51932.html</a> for the<br />
history of that change)<br />
<br />
<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; &gt; but if we decide to keep it, we should make it possible for people to be<br />
&gt; &gt; able to request for voting karma, and a way to handle those requests.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Why sending a message to the list is not enough?<br />
&gt;<br />
<br />
dunno, but it seems it isn't, as nobody replied or gave voting karma to<br />
William.<br />
<br />
-- <br />
Ferenc Kovács<br />
@Tyr43l - <a href="http://tyrael.hu" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://tyrael.hu</a>]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Ferenc Kovacs</dc:creator>
            <category>php-internals</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 02:10:03 +0200</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,479826,480519#msg-480519</guid>
            <title>Re: [PHP-DEV] voting without vcs accounts</title>
            <link>http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,479826,480519#msg-480519</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Hi!<br />
<br />
&gt; no, it only means that our internal processes aren't clear or easily<br />
&gt; accessible.<br />
&gt; people outside the circle can't do much, than asking people inside to<br />
&gt; let them in.<br />
<br />
If somebody is an outsider to PHP development, why do you think giving<br />
him a deciding vote on it would be a good thing? One can discuss things,<br />
propose changes, etc. without any special access.<br />
<br />
&gt; you mean the +1/-1 on the mailing list threads?<br />
<br />
No, I mean community voting in the wiki. Voting plugin has option to<br />
allow anybody to vote. We did such polls in the past. We can do it any day.<br />
<br />
&gt; but if we decide to keep it, we should make it possible for people to be<br />
&gt; able to request for voting karma, and a way to handle those requests.<br />
<br />
Why sending a message to the list is not enough?<br />
-- <br />
Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect<br />
SugarCRM: <a href="http://www.sugarcrm.com/" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://www.sugarcrm.com/</a><br />
(408)454-6900 ext. 227<br />
<br />
-- <br />
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List<br />
To unsubscribe, visit: <a href="http://www.php.net/unsub.php" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://www.php.net/unsub.php</a>]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Stas Malyshev</dc:creator>
            <category>php-internals</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 02:00:02 +0200</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,479826,480512#msg-480512</guid>
            <title>Re: [PHP-DEV] voting without vcs accounts</title>
            <link>http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,479826,480512#msg-480512</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 1:32 AM, Stas Malyshev &lt;smalyshev@sugarcrm.com&gt;wrote:<br />
<br />
&gt; Hi!<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; &gt; the voting RFC explicitly states that it is possible for (some) non-vcs<br />
&gt; &gt; users to vote, but there isn't any formal process on how can someone<br />
&gt; &gt; apply for voting karma, and what is the decision making process on this..<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; And what is the problem in not having the formal process?<br />
&gt;<br />
<br />
uhm. do I really have to explain it? for you? the same reason why we have<br />
the rfc process, the release process, the voting process.<br />
I'm not talking about 100% complete, unchangeable rules, but some kind of<br />
process to follow.<br />
mentioning the option for non-vcs users to vote in the voting RFC without<br />
providing them a way to apply for karma is the same as we wouldn't mention<br />
it at all.<br />
I could also accept if we don't allow them, but then we should be clear<br />
about it.<br />
<br />
<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; &gt; which went unanswered and I was also questioned on irc/twitter multiple<br />
&gt; &gt; times about how can somebody request voting karma.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; I'd say if you have to request it and you have to ask about it on<br />
&gt; twitter, you probably do not know enough about PHP development process<br />
&gt; to have a deciding vote on PHP features.<br />
<br />
<br />
no, it only means that our internal processes aren't clear or easily<br />
accessible.<br />
people outside the circle can't do much, than asking people inside to let<br />
them in.<br />
<br />
<br />
&gt; For non-deciding votes, we have<br />
&gt; community voting where pretty much anyone can vote.<br />
&gt;<br />
<br />
you mean the +1/-1 on the mailing list threads?<br />
that's nice, but I'm talking about the voting laid out in the voting<br />
process rfc <a href="https://wiki.php.net/rfc/voting" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">https://wiki.php.net/rfc/voting</a> (what you also supported).<br />
<br />
as I mentioned before, I can live with it if we remove the ability for<br />
non-vcs users to vote, but in that case we should update the rfc (and the<br />
karma check in the wiki) accordingly.<br />
but if we decide to keep it, we should make it possible for people to be<br />
able to request for voting karma, and a way to handle those requests.<br />
-- <br />
Ferenc Kovács<br />
@Tyr43l - <a href="http://tyrael.hu" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://tyrael.hu</a>]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Ferenc Kovacs</dc:creator>
            <category>php-internals</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 01:50:02 +0200</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,479826,480510#msg-480510</guid>
            <title>Re: [PHP-DEV] voting without vcs accounts</title>
            <link>http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,479826,480510#msg-480510</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Hi!<br />
<br />
&gt; the voting RFC explicitly states that it is possible for (some) non-vcs<br />
&gt; users to vote, but there isn't any formal process on how can someone<br />
&gt; apply for voting karma, and what is the decision making process on this.<br />
<br />
And what is the problem in not having the formal process?<br />
<br />
&gt; which went unanswered and I was also questioned on irc/twitter multiple<br />
&gt; times about how can somebody request voting karma.<br />
<br />
I'd say if you have to request it and you have to ask about it on<br />
twitter, you probably do not know enough about PHP development process<br />
to have a deciding vote on PHP features. For non-deciding votes, we have<br />
community voting where pretty much anyone can vote.<br />
<br />
-- <br />
Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect<br />
SugarCRM: <a href="http://www.sugarcrm.com/" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://www.sugarcrm.com/</a><br />
(408)454-6900 ext. 227<br />
<br />
-- <br />
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List<br />
To unsubscribe, visit: <a href="http://www.php.net/unsub.php" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow">http://www.php.net/unsub.php</a>]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Stas Malyshev</dc:creator>
            <category>php-internals</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 01:40:02 +0200</pubDate>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
